Midatauro
Member

Macron nomina Liliana Segre cavaliere nella Legion d'Onore francese: ha difeso i diritti umani

A comunicarlo alla senatrice a vita è stato l'ambasciatore di Francia a Roma: “Riconoscimento da parte della Francia per il suo straordinario impegno per i diritti umani”.

2 - 10 - 2020

The legal battles over voting that could swing the US election | US news | The Guardian


Delays in verifying mail-in ballots will slow election tally

Non mi interessa essere un utente di serie B che non può scrivere in AP, peraltro infestata prevalentemente da populisti di destra che esprimono ossessione per i comunisti in Italia, fuori tempo massimo, ed altre sciocchezze.
Lascio che siano altri a contribuire ai contatti ed alle conseguenti entrate pubblicitarie di FOL.
Su qualche spazio msg. visitatori dei profili ho messo link che forniscono informazioni che rettificano disinformazione inviata da altri in AP.
Post pubblici sui forum li invierò nei forum di Investireoggi e anche su Facebook.

Lo stato del Texas - che alcuni repubblicani temono che il presidente Donald Trump possa perdere alle elezioni statunitensi - ha reso più difficile votare nelle città prevalentemente democratiche riducendo i punti di raccolta in cui le persone possono consegnare le loro schede.
Il governatore repubblicano Greg Abbott, un alleato del presidente, ha annunciato oggi che le contee del Texas potrebbero avere un solo luogo per raccogliere le schede di posta completate dagli elettori - una mossa che secondo i critici equivale alla soppressione degli elettori in popolose città di sinistra come Austin e Houston .

US Election 2020: Trump assisted by alleged Republican voter suppression to win Texas


La soppressione del voto negli Usa - Radio Popolare

L’America si considera un Paese democratico per eccellenza ma la strategia repubblicana di sopprimere i voti degli elettori di gruppi minoritari macchia questi ideali democratici.

La soppressione del voto: arma efficace dei repubblicani? | Notizie Geopolitiche

Trump's encouragement of GOP poll watchers echoes an old tactic of voter intimidation

Trump introduced Amy Coney Barrett but kept the quiet part quiet.


Amy Corey Barrett e nemica dei lavoratori - Jacobin Italia


Trump's War on the Whole Idea of an Independent Judiciary - The Atlantic

Usa, il razzismo <<istituzionale>> | RIFLESSIONI



Razzismo istituzionale negli Stati Uniti? L'intervista al professor Mario Del Pero - Radio Popolare

Fox News runs with Trump director of national intelligence’s new Russian disinformation effort | Media Matters for America

by Paul Butler

September 24, 2020 at 6:36 PM EDT

Paul Butler is the Albert Brick Professor in Law at Georgetown University. A former federal prosecutor, he is the author of “Chokehold: Policing Black Men.”
Everybody, from President Trump to activists in the movement for Black lives, claims to understand that there is a problem with policing in the United States. Democrats, including Joe Biden and Kamala D. Harris, say the problem is systemic. Republicans disagree, arguing that just a few bad apples are at fault. But they don’t even mean that. The decision in the Breonna Taylor case exemplifies how conservatives are fine with state violence against people of color.
...
I’m a former prosecutor, and I would have charged all three officers with manslaughter. I think murder would be overcharging, because the officers did not have the intent to kill Taylor. Still, if three gang members burst into an apartment, were met with gunfire by somebody in the home, and in response shot up the apartment complex and killed an innocent person, they would almost certainly be charged with homicide.
It’s no less of a crime when three cops do the same thing. Self-defense is an issue, but one that a jury should decide. We know the officers continued to fire long after any threat ceased. A neighbor called 911 to report gunfire, and 68 seconds into the call, you can still hear the shots. Further, under Kentucky law, you can’t claim self-defense if your actions placed innocent people in danger, as the police who killed Taylor obviously did.
This is a case about three bad-apple cops. It doesn’t require structural change, reform or a new law — manslaughter and reckless homicide are already crimes. One might expect a conservative prosecutor to throw the book at these officers, as an opportunity to demonstrate his commitment to equal justice under the law.
Cameron is a rising Republican star; he spoke at the GOP convention, and Trump listed him as a possible Supreme Court nominee.
At the news conference Wednesday announcing the decision in the Taylor case, Cameron was more critical of “cel*br*ties, influencers and activists” than of the police who killed Taylor. He railed against “mob justice” by protesters but said that the police violence of shooting an innocent woman six times was “justified.”
The takeaway was that blue lives rule, and that Black lives don’t matter as much.
...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/gdpr-...ically-weak%2f