che lettera !!!!

[ramirez]

La lettera è moolto interessante in molti punti. A me piace uno in
particolare. Quello in cui si dà dell'idio-ta a molta gente
che avendo studiato ad Harvard, Yale o..(potremmo dire Bocconi ??)
passa per essere UN GENIO (per forza se ha studiato colà !!!!)
Più volte nel forum ho sostenuto che i politici e gli imprenditori
(più o meno laureati come quelli di cui sopra) non sono migliori di noi
(gente comune) e soprattutto mancano di una dote essenziale:
LA FANTASIA !!! Qualcuno qui nel fol mi disse...ma no, se non si fa
è perchè non c'è vantaggio...non conviene.....mica a chiedersi
se per caso 'il non fare' dipende unicamente da mancanza di fantasia
da parte del politico o dell'imprenditore.
Beh dedico questa lettera a tutti quelli che pensano che
chi occupa posti di potere E' PER FORZA INTELLIGENTE E CAPACE....
.

Andrew Lahde, manager of a small California hedge fund, Lahde Capital, burst into the spotlight last year after his one-year-old fund returned 866 percent betting against the subprime collapse.

Last month, he did the unthinkable -- he shut things down, claiming dealing with his bank
counterparties had become too risky. Today, Lahde passed along his "goodbye" letter, a rollicking missive on everything from greed to economic philosophy. Enjoy:

Today I write not to gloat. Given the pain that nearly everyone is experiencing, that would be entirely inappropriate. Nor am I writing to make further predictions, as most of my forecasts in previous letters have unfolded or are in the process of unfolding. Instead, I am writing to say goodbye.

Recently, on the front page of Section C of the Wall Street Journal, a hedge fund manager who was also closing up shop (a $300 million fund), was quoted as saying, "What I have learned about the hedge fund business is that I hate it." I could not agree more with that statement. I was in this game for the money. The low hanging fruit, i.e. idiots whose parents paid for prep school, Yale, and then the Harvard MBA, was there for the taking. These people who were (often) truly not worthy of the education they received (or supposedly received) rose to the top of companies such as AIG, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers and all levels of our government. All of this behavior supporting the Aristocracy, only ended up making it easier for me to find people stupid enough to take the other side of my trades. God bless America.

There are far too many people for me to sincerely thank for my success. However, I do not want to sound like a Hollywood actor accepting an award. The money was reward enough. Furthermore, the endless list those deserving thanks know who they are.



I will no longer manage money for other people or institutions. I have enough of my own wealth to manage. Some people, who think they have arrived at a reasonable estimate of my net worth, might be surprised that I would call it quits with such a small war chest. That is fine; I am content with my rewards. Moreover, I will let others try to amass nine, ten or eleven figure net worths. Meanwhile, their lives suck. Appointments back to back, booked solid for the next three months, they look forward to their two week vacation in January during which they will likely be glued to their Blackberries or other such devices. What is the point? They will all be forgotten in fifty years anyway. Steve Balmer, Steven Cohen, and Larry Ellison will all be forgotten. I do not understand the legacy thing. Nearly everyone will be forgotten. Give up on leaving your mark. Throw the Blackberry away and enjoy life.

So this is it. With all due respect, I am dropping out. Please do not expect any type of reply to emails or voicemails within normal time frames or at all. Andy Springer and his company will be handling the dissolution of the fund. And don't worry about my employees, they were always employed by Mr. Springer's company and only one (who has been well-rewarded) will lose his job.

I have no interest in any deals in which anyone would like me to participate. I truly do not have a strong opinion about any market right now, other than to say that things will continue to get worse for some time, probably years. I am content sitting on the sidelines and waiting. After all, sitting and waiting is how we made money from the subprime debacle. I now have time to repair my health, which was destroyed by the stress I layered onto myself over the past two years, as well as my entire life -- where I had to compete for spaces in universities and graduate schools, jobs and assets under management -- with those who had all the advantages (rich parents) that I did not. May meritocracy be part of a new form of government, which needs to be established.


On the issue of the U.S. Government, I would like to make a modest proposal. First, I point out the obvious flaws, whereby legislation was repeatedly brought forth to Congress over the past eight years, which would have reigned in the predatory lending practices of now mostly defunct institutions. These institutions regularly filled the coffers of both parties in return for voting down all of this legislation designed to protect the common citizen. This is an outrage, yet no one seems to know or care about it. Since Thomas Jefferson and Adam Smith passed, I would argue that there has been a dearth of worthy philosophers in this country, at least ones focused on improving government.

Capitalism worked for two hundred years, but times change, and systems become corrupt. George Soros, a man of staggering wealth, has stated that he would like to be remembered as a philosopher. My suggestion is that this great man start and sponsor a forum for great minds to come together to create a new system of government that truly represents the common man's interest, while at the same time creating rewards great enough to attract the best and brightest minds to serve in government roles without having to rely on corruption to further their interests or lifestyles. This forum could be similar to the one used to create the operating system, Linux, which competes with Microsoft's near monopoly. I believe there is an answer, but for now the system is clearly broken.

From Portfolio: Who Got Screwed in the Wall St. Bailout?
Lastly, while I still have an audience, I would like to bring attention to an alternative food and energy source. You won't see it included in BP's, "Feel good. We are working on sustainable solutions," television commercials, nor is it mentioned in ADM's similar commercials. But hemp has been used for at least 5,000 years for cloth and food, as well as just about everything that is produced from petroleum products. Hemp is not marijuana and vice versa. Hemp is the male plant and it grows like a weed, hence the slang term. The original American flag was made of hemp fiber and our Constitution was printed on paper made of hemp. It was used as recently as World War II by the U.S. Government, and then promptly made illegal after the war was won. At a time when rhetoric is flying about becoming more self-sufficient in terms of energy, why is it illegal to grow this plant in this country?

Ah, the female. The evil female plant -- marijuana. It gets you high, it makes you laugh, it does not produce a hangover. Unlike alcohol, it does not result in bar fights or wife beating. So, why is this innocuous plant illegal? Is it a gateway drug? No, that would be alcohol, which is so heavily advertised in this country. My only conclusion as to why it is illegal, is that Corporate America, which owns Congress, would rather sell you Paxil, Zoloft, Xanax and other additive drugs, than allow you to grow a plant in your home without some of the profits going into their coffers. This policy is ludicrous. It has surely contributed to our dependency on foreign energy sources. Our policies have other countries literally laughing at our stupidity, most notably Canada, as well as several European nations (both Eastern and Western). You would not know this by paying attention to U.S. media sources though, as they tend not to elaborate on who is laughing at the United States this week. Please people, let's stop the rhetoric and start thinking about how we can truly become self-sufficient.

With that I say good-bye and good luck.

All the best,

Andrew Lahde

[kasparek]

Ad Harvard, Yale, od in Bocconi, si studia ciò che ha stabilito l'establishment, non ciò che la scienza economica (scienza sociale, non scienza esatta, e per questo sempre opinabilissima) è in grado di dirci per spiegare la realtà. Aggiungi il fatto che uno studente diligente a 20 anni studia con una buona dose di umiltà, prendendo per buono ciò che viene detto (anche perchè se no non passi gli esami), anche per il fatto che si studia un mondo che di fatto non si è ancora conosciuto dal vero. E' difficile avere subito una visione della realtà e di ciò che si è studiato fortemente critica. Secondo me viene dopo anni, quando nella maggior parte dei casi si è entrati nel "circolo" dell'establishment e del potere. Ed a quel punto occorre anche avere il coraggio e la possibilità di sputare nel piatto in cui si mangia.
Brutto a dirsi, ma è così.

PS: non ho letto integralmente la lettera.

[ramirez]

Sono una persona 'terra-terra'. Semplice e pragmatico.
Il mio 3d aveva uno scopo mooolto semplice.
La TV (in Italia la maggior parte della popolazione viene informata
SOLO dalle TV) ed i media in generale ci mostrano COSIDETTE
PERSONE COMPETENTI certificate dal fatto di essere laureate
alla tal Università o addirittura insegnare in quell'Università.
Beh come si evince dalla lettera ci sono in giro un mare
di INCOMPETENTI pur essendo 'portatori' di ottimi
certificati di laurea.

[Elliot_surfer]

Originalmente inviato da ramirez

From Portfolio: Who Got Screwed in the Wall St. Bailout?
Lastly, while I still have an audience, I would like to bring attention to an alternative food and energy source. You won't see it included in BP's, "Feel good. We are working on sustainable solutions," television commercials, nor is it mentioned in ADM's similar commercials. But hemp has been used for at least 5,000 years for cloth and food, as well as just about everything that is produced from petroleum products. Hemp is not marijuana and vice versa. Hemp is the male plant and it grows like a weed, hence the slang term. The original American flag was made of hemp fiber and our Constitution was printed on paper made of hemp. It was used as recently as World War II by the U.S. Government, and then promptly made illegal after the war was won. At a time when rhetoric is flying about becoming more self-sufficient in terms of energy, why is it illegal to grow this plant in this country?

Ah, the female. The evil female plant -- marijuana. It gets you high, it makes you laugh, it does not produce a hangover. Unlike alcohol, it does not result in bar fights or wife beating. So, why is this innocuous plant illegal? Is it a gateway drug? No, that would be alcohol, which is so heavily advertised in this country. My only conclusion as to why it is illegal, is that Corporate America, which owns Congress, would rather sell you Paxil, Zoloft, Xanax and other additive drugs, than allow you to grow a plant in your home without some of the profits going into their coffers. This policy is ludicrous. It has surely contributed to our dependency on foreign energy sources. Our policies have other countries literally laughing at our stupidity, most notably Canada, as well as several European nations (both Eastern and Western). You would not know this by paying attention to U.S. media sources though, as they tend not to elaborate on who is laughing at the United States this week. Please people, let's stop the rhetoric and start thinking about how we can truly become self-sufficient.

With that I say good-bye and good luck.

All the best,

Andrew Lahde

Che dire ... Quoto tutto quello che ho quotato!!!!!!

Bell' articolo Ramirez

[ramirez]

Originalmente inviato da Elliot_surfer

Che dire ... Quoto tutto quello che ho quotato!!!!!!

Bell' articolo Ramirez

porca puzzola !!! speravo che nessuno si accorgesse di quel
punto ......mi ero dimenticato di te
.
p.s. però devi riconoscere onestà intellettuale
avrei potuto 'togliere' quella parte che, tutto sommato,
non c'entra molto con quanto scritto nelle righe precedenti..

[ScubaDuc]

No... c'entra Rami eccome...

Se noi comprassimo una di quelle macchine per fare il pane e mischiassimo gli ingredienti, un kilo di pane ci costerebbe meno di un'euro a fronte dei piu' di tre' che ci caricano. La differenza sarebbe che non solo il panettiere ci rimette i soldi, ma anche lo stato che non ci sgramma piu' ne l'IVA ne le tasse sui salari dei commessi..

La macchinetta l'ho vista a 59 eurucci.... per il pane inteso...

Paradossalmente, il piu' grande patatrac nel sistema si registrerebbe se in massa ci dedicassimo ad attivita' autartiche ed investissimo i nostri soldi in oro fisico, o sotto il materasso

[Ondina]

Originalmente inviato da ScubaDuc

No... c'entra Rami eccome...

Se noi comprassimo una di quelle macchine per fare il pane e mischiassimo gli ingredienti, un kilo di pane ci costerebbe meno di un'euro a fronte dei piu' di tre' che ci caricano. La differenza sarebbe che non solo il panettiere ci rimette i soldi, ma anche lo stato che non ci sgramma piu' ne l'IVA ne le tasse sui salari dei commessi..

La macchinetta l'ho vista a 59 eurucci.... per il pane inteso...

Paradossalmente, il piu' grande patatrac nel sistema si registrerebbe se in massa ci dedicassimo ad attivita' autartiche ed investissimo i nostri soldi in oro fisico, o sotto il materasso

0,45 per la precisione, qualcuno l'ha calcolato. L'ho vista usare da un amico prof universitario mentre ero ospite da loro, che stanno in campagna. Lui ci mette farina lievito e acqua poi preme un bottone, prima di andare all'università. La macchina impasta, fa lievitare, cuoce e volendo mantiene anche il pane il caldo. Il pane prodotto dura più giorni.

[ScubaDuc]

Originalmente inviato da Ondina

0,45 per la precisione, qualcuno l'ha calcolato. L'ho vista usare da un amico prof universitario mentre ero ospite da loro, che stanno in campagna. Lui ci mette farina lievito e acqua poi preme un bottone, prima di andare all'università. La macchina impasta, fa lievitare, cuoce e volendo mantiene anche il pane il caldo. Il pane prodotto dura più giorni.

Io l'avevo stimato a mezzo euro.... Comunque il pay-back e' meno di un'anno

Purtroppo non fa' le michettine croccanti che non trovo in Belgio

[ramirez]

la macchinetta ce l'ho !! E' lì ad ammuffire !!!
provato un paio di volte..è vero metti farina lievito acqua
e schiacci un bottone.....solo che se ne esce (magari per
mia incapacità) una 'mappazza' nel senso un blocco ..
quadrato che non ci soddisfa. Forse avremmo dovuto fare
altri esperimenti...mia moglie preferisce impastare lei
e cuocere nel forno elettrico. Appena sfornato non è male !!!

[Ondina]

Originalmente inviato da ramirez

la macchinetta ce l'ho !! E' lì ad ammuffire !!!
provato un paio di volte..è vero metti farina lievito acqua
e schiacci un bottone.....solo che se ne esce (magari per
mia incapacità) una 'mappazza' nel senso un blocco ..
quadrato che non ci soddisfa. Forse avremmo dovuto fare
altri esperimenti...mia moglie preferisce impastare lei
e cuocere nel forno elettrico. Appena sfornato non è male !!!

Il pane mangiato dai miei amici era buonissimo.